Maxwell’s Reciprocal Deflection Lab Report | Theory of Structures II
Maxwell's Law of  Reciprocal Deflection - Theory of Structures II

Lab Report: Verification of Maxwell’s Law of Reciprocal Deflection

Lab Report: Verification of Maxwell’s Law of Reciprocal Deflection

Experiment Information

Experiment: Verification of Maxwell’s Law of Reciprocal Deflection

Description: Complete lab report covering theory, procedure, observations and analysis of reciprocal deflection in structures

Complete Lab Report

Verification of Maxwell’s Law of Reciprocal Deflection

1. OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives of this experiment are:

  • To experimentally verify Maxwell’s law of reciprocal deflections.
  • To compare the deflections observed in the experiment with their theoretical values.
  • To calculate and compare the mutual deflections at various points on the beam.

2. THEORY

Maxwell’s law of reciprocal deflections states that for a linearly elastic structure, the deflection at a point A in a specific direction when a force is applied at a point B is equal to the deflection at point B in the direction of the same force when it is applied at point A.

Mathematically, this can be expressed as:

\[ \delta_{AB} = \delta_{BA} \]

Where:

  • \(\delta_{AB}\) is the deflection at point A due to a load at point B.
  • \(\delta_{BA}\) is the deflection at point B due to the same load at point A.

3. APPARATUS

The experiment utilizes a beam setup with specific loading points and measurement locations. Key components include:

  • A simply supported beam.
  • Weights to apply loads at designated points (B, C, and D).
  • Dial gauges to measure deflections at these points.

4. PROCEDURE

The experiment was conducted as follows:

  1. A stabilizing load of 5N was initially applied at point B, and the initial readings on the dial gauges at points C and D were recorded.
  2. Additional loads of 5N, 10N, 15N, and 20N were sequentially applied at point B, and the corresponding dial gauge readings at C and D were noted for each load increment.
  3. The process was repeated by moving the load to point C and then to point D, with the dial gauges repositioned to measure the corresponding reciprocal deflections.
  4. All observations were systematically recorded in tables.

5. OBSERVATIONS

The following data was recorded during the experiment:

Table 1: Load Applied at Point B

Load at B (N) Dial gauge reading at C (mm) Dial gauge reading at D (mm) Deflection δcb (mm) Deflection δdb (mm)
0 7.00 10.90
5 5.45 9.93 1.55 0.97
10 3.94 8.98 3.06 1.92
15 2.26 7.97 4.74 2.93
20 0.96 7.09 6.04 3.81

Table 2: Load Applied at Point C

Load at C (N) Dial gauge reading at B (mm) Dial gauge reading at D (mm) Deflection δbc (mm) Deflection δdc (mm)
0 9.20 10.79
5 7.76 9.27 1.44 1.45
10 6.14 7.68 3.06 3.06
15 4.62 6.16 4.58 4.58
20 3.15 4.70 6.05 6.04

Table 3: Load Applied at Point D

Load at D (N) Dial gauge reading at B (mm) Dial gauge reading at C (mm) Deflection δbd (mm) Deflection δcd (mm)
0 9.35 8.62
5 8.40 7.11 0.95 1.51
10 7.43 5.62 1.92 3.00
15 6.42 4.02 2.93 4.80
20 5.42 2.54 3.93 6.08

6. RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS

Theoretical Deflection

Castigliano’s theorem was used to determine the theoretical deflection. The deflection is given by the formula:

\[ \delta = \int \frac{M_x}{EI} \frac{\partial M_x}{\partial P} dx \]

For the beam with the specified properties (b=25mm, h=5mm, E=2×1011N/m2, I=260.417×10-12m4), the theoretical deflection was calculated as follows:

  • Theoretical \(\delta_{bc}\): \(\frac{55}{192EI}\) = 5.5 mm
  • Theoretical \(\delta_{cb}\): \(\frac{55}{192EI}\) = 5.5 mm

The theoretical calculations confirm Maxwell’s theorem, showing that \(\delta_{bc} = \delta_{cb}\).

Experimental Deflection

From the experimental data for a 20N load:

  • The deflection at C due to the load at B (\(\delta_{cb}\)) was 6.04 mm.
  • The deflection at B due to the load at C (\(\delta_{bc}\)) was 6.05 mm.

The experimental results show a close agreement, with \(\delta_{cb} \approx \delta_{bc}\).

Percentage Error

The percentage error between the average experimental value (6.045 mm, approximated to 6.04 mm in the document) and the theoretical value (5.5 mm) is calculated as:

\[ \text{Error} = \left( \frac{6.04 – 5.5}{5.5} \right) \times 100\% = 9.81\% \]

7. CONCLUSION

The experiment successfully verified Maxwell’s Law of Reciprocal Deflection. The theoretical deflection was calculated to be 5.5 mm, while the average measured practical deflection was 6.04 mm under a 20N load.

The observed difference of 9.81% between the theoretical and experimental values can be attributed to potential sources of error, including:

  • Imperfections in the material of the beam.
  • Human error during the measurement of deflections.
  • The assumptions of ideal material behavior and perfect support conditions in the theoretical calculations.
×

Disclaimer

The educational materials provided on this website are intended as supplementary resources to support your learning journey. These lab reports are sample documents designed to help students understand proper formatting and content organization.

We have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the content. However, we recommend students to perform their own experiments and prepare original reports. These samples should be used as references only.

We respect intellectual property rights. If you believe any content should be credited differently or removed, please don’t hesitate to contact us. We’re happy to make appropriate corrections or give proper attribution.

Scroll to Top